JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 11, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Elson Rafael Rodrigo Rodriguez Beltran

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Derecho político de todo ciudadano
Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Carácter técnico procesal
  • Admisión y rechazo
Accion Publica De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Derecho del ciudadano a participar en la conformación, ejercicio y control del poder político
  • Requisitos
5 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de Súplica contra el auto proferido por el Magistrado Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio para rechazar la demanda de la referencia, por cuanto el demandante dejó vencer en silencio la oportunidad legal para pronunciarse sobre los yerros advertidos en el auto de inadmisión, relacionados con la falta de claridad, pertinencia y suficiencia de la argumentación inicial.

La Sala Plena decide confirmar el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. CONFIRMAR el auto de enero 27 de 2014, mediante el cual fue rechazada por el Magistrado sustanciador la demanda de inconstitucionalidad presentada en este asunto por el ciudadano Elson Rafael Rodrigo Rodriguez Beltran.
  2. En firme este auto, contra el cual no procede recurso alguno, archivese el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.